 |
|
|
Automatic
Fire Sprinklers: The Facts
|
Automatic
fire sprinklers have been in use in the U.S. since 1874.
Fire sprinklers are widely recognized as the single most effective method
for fighting the spread of fires in their early stages - before they can
cause severe injury to people and damage to property.
When one fire sprinkler head goes off to fight a fire, the entire sprinkler
system does NOT activate. Sprinklers react to temperatures in individual
rooms.
The chances of a fire sprinkler accidentally going off are extremely remote.
Over 200 U.S. communities have residential sprinkler laws. Roughly 100
of these communities are in California. In downtown Fresno for example,
there has been fire damage of only $42,000 during a 10-year period in
which its sprinklering law has been in effect.
According to the National Fire Protection Association, property damage
in hotel fires was 78% less in structures with sprinklers than it was
in structures without sprinklers during the years 1983-1987.
Nearly half of all hotels and motels, according to a 1988 survey by NFPA,
have sprinkler systems.
NFPA has no record of a fire killing more than two people in a completely
sprinklered building where the system was properly operating, except in
an explosion or flash fire or where industrial fire brigade members or
employees were killed during fire suppression operations.
The National Fire Protection Association outlines several major strategies
that are key to reductions in fire losses and especially in home fire
deaths, which are 78.3% of the total fire deaths. They are: |
 |
More,
and more widespread, public fire safety education on how to prevent fires
and how to avoid serious injury or death if fire occurs. |
 |
Residential
fire safety initiatives remain the key to reductions in the overall fire
death toll. |
 |
Residential
fire safety initiatives remain the key to reductions in the overall fire
death toll. |
 |
Wider
use and proper maintenance of smoke detectors, coupled with practiced home
escape plans. |
 |
Wider
use of residential sprinklers. |
 |
Additional
efforts to make home products more fire-safe, such as less fire-prone cigarettes
and child-resistant lighters. |
 |
Addressing
the special protection needs of high-risk groups, such as the young, older
adults and the poor. |
Automatic
Fire Sprinklers: The Myths vs Facts
|
Automatic
sprinkler systems have enjoyed an enviable record of protecting life and
property for over 100 years. Yet, there are still common misunderstandings
about the operation and effectiveness of automatic fire sprinkler systems:
Myth 1: "Water damage from a sprinkler system will
be more extensive than fire damage."
Fact:
Water damage from a home sprinkler system will be much less severe than
the damage caused by water from fire-fighting hose lines or smoke and
fire damage if the fire goes unabated. Quick response sprinklers release
8-24 gallons of water per minute compared to 50-125 gallons per minute
released by a firehose.
Myth 2: "When a fire occurs, every sprinkler head
goes off."
Fact:
Sprinkler heads are individually activated by fire. Residential fires
are usually controlled with one sprinkler head. 90% of all fires are controlled
with six or fewer heads and a study conducted in Australia and New Zealand
covering 82 years of automatic sprinkler use found that 82% of the fires
which occurred were controlled by two or fewer sprinklers.
Myth 3: "A smoke detector provides enough protection."
Fact:
Smoke detectors save lives by providing a warning system but can do nothing
to extinguish a growing fire or protect those physically unable to escape
on their own, such as the elderly or small children. Too often, battery
operated smoke detectors fail to function because the batteries are dead
or have been removed. As the percent of homes in America that were "protected"
with smoke detectors increased from zero to more than 70%, the number
of fire deaths in homes did not significantly decrease.
Myth 4: "Sprinklers are designed to protect property, but
are not effective for life safety."
Fact:
Sprinklers provide a high level of life safety. Statistics demonstrate
that there has never been any multiple loss of life in a fully sprinklered
building.Property losses are 85% less in residences with fire sprinklers
compared to those without sprinklers.The combination of automatic sprinklers
and early warning systems in all buildings and residences could reduce
overall injuries, loss of life and property damage by at least 50%.
|
|
|